Archives
Archives
| From: | Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1501346499.14393.3.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by Daniel Campbell |
||
| 1 | > why take away the stable choice? |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I think it is rather clear that stable keywords aren't going anywhere |
| 4 | for architectures like amd64. I suggest we drop all of the subthreads |
| 5 | on this topic and get back to other interesting thoughts (which may |
| 6 | include dropping stable for some other arches of course; I mean doing |
| 7 | it for all doesn't deserve e-mails imo). |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Mart |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | David Seifert <soap@g.o> |