| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:51:38 -0500 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | define exactly how one proves themself, and in what context. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Repeated good contributions. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Just to clarify: We're not going around giving everybody AT-status who just |
| 9 |
asked for it. Normally, we note certain users filing many bugs (=useful |
| 10 |
contributions) and then we're going toward them to ask them whether they want to |
| 11 |
become ATs. Also, they have to pass the current dev quizzes before they become |
| 12 |
ATs, so the required knowledge *is* there. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So, basically, ATs already HAVE proven themselves to be useful. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Simon Stelling |
| 18 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 19 |
blubb@g.o |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives