| 1 |
Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:51:38 -0500 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
| 5 |
>> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> | define exactly how one proves themself, and in what context. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Repeated good contributions. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Just to clarify: We're not going around giving everybody AT-status who |
| 12 |
> just asked for it. Normally, we note certain users filing many bugs |
| 13 |
> (=useful contributions) and then we're going toward them to ask them |
| 14 |
> whether they want to become ATs. Also, they have to pass the current dev |
| 15 |
> quizzes before they become ATs, so the required knowledge *is* there. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> So, basically, ATs already HAVE proven themselves to be useful. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Basically you are saying that they have the skill to be developers, they |
| 21 |
prove them, but they don't have enough time to become full developers? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
lu |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives