Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:13:20
Message-Id: 20090313161317.GB6850@dodo.hsd1.nj.comcast.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )) by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:37:28PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
2 > Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> posted
3 > 200903101315.52142.bangert@g.o, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar
4 > 2009 13:15:36 +0100:
5 >
6 > > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via
7 > > IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize
8 > > more of its potential by better integrating people who dont do IRC.
9 >
10 > This has bothered me too. Some people simply don't do well in
11 > "immediate" (textual) communication mode. They much prefer the minute-
12 > resolution mode of email/web-form/newsgroup to the second-resolution mode
13 > of IRC/IM. I'm one such person.[1] As a result, I have experienced a
14 > high barrier to getting further involved with Gentoo, toward becoming an
15 > AT or dev.
16
17 There are many devs who rarely venture on IRC, yet do a lot of good
18 work. As far as ATs go, it's not a necessity to be on IRC; pretty much
19 the only communication that occurs in #-amd64-dev is coordination of
20 stabilization efforts and goofing off(and the occasional xfce dev talks
21 :p).
22 --
23 ---------
24 Thomas Anderson
25 Gentoo Developer
26 /////////
27 Areas of responsibility:
28 AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
29 ---------