| 1 |
On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about this, so the |
| 7 |
> > intention is to make it consistent. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > The .c/.h files have file-scope licenses, but that isn't true for |
| 10 |
> > everything in the project. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I am willing to make the effort to do this, I was just wondering if |
| 13 |
> > there are any legal pitfalls I need to worry about. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > My theory is I can probably use git to find out who all of the authors |
| 16 |
> > are, and generate an Authors list from that information and from |
| 17 |
> > looking at copyright notices. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> One concern about this is the possibility of copied code. If OpenRC |
| 20 |
> ever copied code from other BSD licensed projects, then dropping the |
| 21 |
> notice from the top of the file would be a violation of the upstream |
| 22 |
> license. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
OpenRC isn't purely Gentoo copyright, so it's already a violation. |
| 25 |
the majority of entries belong to Roy. |
| 26 |
-mike |
Archives