Archives
Archives
| From: | "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems | ||
| Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:31:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070315192923.6b5eb593@c1358217.kevquinn.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems by Jakob Buchgraber |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:40:05 +0100 |
| 2 | Jakob Buchgraber <jakob.buchgraber@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > So why don't you start rewriting, refactoring and improving the |
| 5 | > portage source? It definitely doesn't make sense to create a |
| 6 | > competing package management system. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | "Patches welcome", I think is the appropriate response :) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Seriously, if you want portage to be re-factored, just go ahead and do |
| 11 | it; there's nothing to stop you. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Kevin F. Quinn |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems | Jakob Buchgraber <jakob.buchgraber@××××××××××.com> |