Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/boost: boost-1.46.1-r1.ebuild metadata.xml boost-1.49.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.51.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog boost-1.47.0.ebuild boost-1.35.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.47.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.39.0.ebui
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:08:32
Message-Id: 50928212.6090006@flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/boost: boost-1.46.1-r1.ebuild metadata.xml boost-1.49.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.51.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog boost-1.47.0.ebuild boost-1.35.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.47.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.39.0.ebui by Jamie Learmonth
1 On 01/11/2012 06:50, Jamie Learmonth wrote:
2 >
3 > Who's with me?
4
5 Not me.
6
7 If you're just looking for another binary distribution, CentOS is there.
8 Or Sabayon. Or Ubuntu. Pick your poison.
9
10 But I use and _develop_ Gentoo because I _want_, and sometimes just
11 _need_ source based! Sometiems it's because I'm doing embedded work and
12 I have to shave even those 4KiB, most of the time is because I want the
13 flexibility.
14
15 And unbundling almost never has "negligible advantages" as it's not the
16 _size_ or performance that we care about in those situation but security
17 and reliability.
18
19 Would you rather have to track down Internal Compiler Errors in two
20 dozens packages, or on one, even if it takes slightly longer when it
21 breaks compatibility? (And almost never it takes _that_ long anyway.) I
22 would definitely prefer the one.
23
24 --
25 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
26 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/