| 1 |
On Thursday 09 January 2014 15:24:00 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering |
| 4 |
> > up base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions |
| 5 |
> > to a single herd. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single |
| 8 |
> person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users |
| 9 |
> of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked |
| 10 |
> around problems instead of reporting/discussing them. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it wrong |
| 13 |
wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by. |
| 14 |
-mike |
Archives