Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:20:15
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Thursday 09 January 2014 15:24:00 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
2 > On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 > > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering
4 > > up base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions
5 > > to a single herd.
6 >
7 > Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single
8 > person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users
9 > of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked
10 > around problems instead of reporting/discussing them.
12 how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it wrong
13 wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by.
14 -mike


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>