Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:24:12
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status by Mike Frysinger
1 On 9 January 2014 20:20, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 >
4 > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering up
5 > base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a
6 > single herd.
9 Yeah the problem has been that the herd has been fundamentally a single
10 person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users
11 of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked
12 around problems instead of reporting/discussing them.
14 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
15 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu —


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>