Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:11:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20081209001123.16281209@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree by "Olivier Crête" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:09:50 -0500 |
| 2 | Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > I'd like to go further and ask that for the next EAPI change, we only |
| 4 | > allow ebuilds using it into the tree once a version of portage that |
| 5 | > supports it has gone stable. And then, not make any ebuild with the |
| 6 | > new EAPI stable for 60 more days so that the new EAPI related code in |
| 7 | > portage can be tested properly. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The "can be tested properly" phase is when it's in ~arch... |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree | "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o> |