| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> And yes, it is *very* unlikely that someone uses a slotted live |
| 4 |
> ebuild with two branches being meaningful and managed in the same |
| 5 |
> repo. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
We do that all the time for app-editors/emacs-vcs. For example, we |
| 8 |
used to have live ebuilds for the trunk and for the emacs-24 branch, |
| 9 |
sharing a common repository. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Even if such thing exists, it is broken anyway because you can't say |
| 12 |
> that re-fetching the branches back and forth is a correct solution. |
| 13 |
> And it breaks existing tools anyway. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I haven't notice any breakage with it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ulrich |
Archives