| 1 |
[Please fix your mailer. Your message has a broken "References" header.] |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> This does not answer my question. Is it really a FHS violation? The |
| 6 |
> contents of /usr changes when doing updates using the system package |
| 7 |
> manager. When not doing updates, it really is readonly and the FHS |
| 8 |
> says that /usr is for readonly things. I do not see how it is |
| 9 |
> different from anything else in /usr. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
What about a system that is building binpkgs? Or an rsync mirror? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Ulrich |
Archives