| 1 |
On 08/13/2013 04:10 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> As per my comment in bugzilla [1] I said that the patch should be |
| 3 |
> submitted upstream prior having it in cvs. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Yet you decided to completely ignore my statement and just smash in the |
| 6 |
> patch anyway [2]. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Please don't do this ever again. We had shitload of distro patches |
| 9 |
> before and it is hell to strip away later on. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I left the bug open so it doesn't get forgotten. It'll not take you more |
| 12 |
time to handle that bug ... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> For your statement of lacking documentation, when I google gerrit |
| 16 |
> libreoffice first two links lead directly to the instance and 3rd to |
| 17 |
> wiki [3], which no suprise is guide how to set it up and submit request, |
| 18 |
> so stop lying. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I have no interest in spending some hours to figure out an arcane |
| 21 |
interface that doesn't work by default. Since you already know how it |
| 22 |
works it's a more efficient use of your two minutes than wasting hours |
| 23 |
listening to my frustrated ranting |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> As you like to ignore maintainer requests I now expect you to submit it |
| 26 |
> to the gerit, since now you have the guide and you can proceed without |
| 27 |
> an issue right? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Note that I have nothing against other devs submitting fixes to ebuilds |
| 30 |
> maintained by me, but directly ignoring what I said on a bug and doing |
| 31 |
> whatever you see fit does not match that at all. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Then don't leave such simple bugs open for a long time. It was broken, |
| 34 |
now it builds again: User experience has been improved. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Your work for further triaging this bug has not been affected. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Everyone profits. |
Archives