Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:11:35
Message-Id: CAEdQ38H7rmB3hgFZzWZ4Txb67Z+Ta41azYbC=2HDYEsNFKcc=g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation by James Cloos
1 On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:35 PM, James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote:
2 >>>>>> "MT" == Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> writes:
3 >
4 > MT> Is that a problem with the ABI, or just that gcc-4.6 is more strict?
5 > MT> I think it's the latter.
6 >
7 > The failure occurs at the linking stage, not the compiling stage.
8 >
9 > Ie, ln(1) cannot find some of the symbols it needs if the .so was
10 > compiled with 4.5 and the .o files with 4.6.
11 >
12 > Which looks like an ABI issue, yes?
13 >
14 > Again, though, only for some libs.  And I do not remember which.
15
16 Right, if it fails at link time, it's possibly an ABI incompatibility.
17 I just haven't ever experienced this myself.
18
19 Matt