| 1 |
2008-07-18 16:01:28 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> Olivier Crte wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 18:01 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> This brings out the fun of circular depends. I don't really know how to |
| 6 |
> >> address this but a lot of packages are going to have to be updated to |
| 7 |
> >> contain proper depends. i.e. C based apps will need |
| 8 |
> >> RDEPEND="virtual/libc". C++ packages will need a stdc++ depend. |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Adding a dep to libc almost everywhere seems extremely wrong to me. I |
| 12 |
> > though we had decided many times that it was a bad idea. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> Yes. Adding libc everywhere is wrong. However, if you don't have one of |
| 16 |
> the packages listed here [1], your libc won't ever update. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify '@system' during |
| 19 |
updates, e.g. `emerge -uDN @system @world`. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives