Archives
Archives
| From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Ciaran McCreesh <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role | ||
| Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:52:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 772584697.20060228124535@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | 27.2.2006, 22:32:39, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I quote the official policy: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1 |
| 6 | >> Occasionally, ebuilds will have conflicting USE flags for |
| 7 | >> functionality. Checking for them and returning an error is not a |
| 8 | >> viable solution. Instead, you must pick one of the USE flags in |
| 9 | >> conflict to favour. One example comes from the msmtp ebuilds. The |
| 10 | >> package can use either SSL with GnuTLS, SSL with OpenSSL, or no SSL |
| 11 | >> at all. Because GnuTLS is more featureful than OpenSSL, it is |
| 12 | >> favoured: |
| 13 | |
| 14 | And - one more note - when and where has been the following change discussed |
| 15 | and who approved that?! |
| 16 | |
| 17 | http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/devrel/handbook/hb-guide-ebuild.xml?r1=1.25&r2=1.26&root=gentoo |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | Best regards, |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Jakub Moc |
| 24 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 25 | GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 26 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ... still no signature ;) |