| 1 |
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 12:44:42 -0500 |
| 2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Have you even looked at gollum for example? it can support mw markdown. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I've looked at it, but none of my reading of online material indicates |
| 7 |
whether it supports more than the existing media-wiki *syntax*. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
For instance, Gollum states support for macros, but definition of those |
| 10 |
macros requires writing ruby code, which is a far stretch from |
| 11 |
MediaWiki's "other wiki articles are your macros" |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Nothing I've read clarifies my confusion as to whether gollum actually |
| 14 |
supports all the *features* of MediaWiki, only seeming to indicate it |
| 15 |
supports syntax-mimicry. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Which, if true, would fall into the category of "Not a suitable |
| 18 |
replacement" |
Archives