| 1 |
Il giorno gio, 02/12/2010 alle 17.24 +0200, Petteri Räty ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Ok thanks for clarifying the last point. Doesn't this go against your |
| 4 |
> original wish to mask it though? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
If you read my first mail, I said I want them masked, and not removed |
| 7 |
because they are still useful for upstream work. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Being useful for upstream work, I don't want them being unavailable or |
| 10 |
unusable, which would happen if you were to block them on newer libtool |
| 11 |
just as much as it would happen by removing them. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The mask might be something along the lines of |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
# Obsolete automake packages, only useful for upstream work. |
| 16 |
# Do not depend on them, and don't install them unless you really |
| 17 |
# need to use them. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(And having them masked, repoman will complain if somebody was to use |
| 20 |
WANT_AUTOMAKE=1.4). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
| 24 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
| 27 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |
Archives