1 |
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 23:42, John Davis wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all - |
3 |
> To start preparing for 2004.2 in July, releng is opening up Feature |
4 |
> Requests that the community would like to see included in 2004.2. The |
5 |
> last day that we are accepting requests is Friday, May 7th at which |
6 |
> point releng will hold a meeting and decide which requests are feasible |
7 |
> for both the alloted time and workload. Thank you for your time and your |
8 |
> requests. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Cheers, |
11 |
> //zhen |
12 |
|
13 |
Ok, sorry for the lag in response, I had 2 exams today plus I am |
14 |
fighting a cold. I will try to answer all of the questions :) If I |
15 |
forget any, please send jforman my way with a baseball bat, he loves |
16 |
that type of thing. |
17 |
|
18 |
First, if your request is a package inclusion request (such as distcc, |
19 |
netcat) please bug it on bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to |
20 |
release@g.o. These requests are rather trivial to implement, so a |
21 |
full blown feature request is not needed. Necessary dicussion can be |
22 |
carried out on bugs.gentoo.org. |
23 |
|
24 |
Next, the release schedule. There are a couple of ways to go about this. |
25 |
I think Daniel built an end of the year/ holiday break into the release |
26 |
schedule when he first came up with the quarterly schedule. The break |
27 |
from (late) October -> January/ February is meant to accomodate this. |
28 |
Personally, I think it is a good idea as it gives us all time to |
29 |
re-group, spend time with family, and perhaps hack in our spare time on |
30 |
the harder features, etc. Of course, if people want to change this, we |
31 |
can change the release cycle so that the big break is over the summer |
32 |
and the regular 2 month cycle at the end of the year. Alternatively, we |
33 |
could redo the schedule so that those extra months at the end of the |
34 |
year are reabsorbed into the schedule to space out all of the releases |
35 |
equally. I am very open to ideas, so please provide your input. |
36 |
|
37 |
Portage enhancements are a tough one. I know that genone has emerge |
38 |
security almost there and GPG manifest signing is somewhere in the |
39 |
middle (need verification here). The problem in making these release |
40 |
guidelines is the fact that they are totally dependent on 2 people's |
41 |
time and work. Releng does not have control over whether or not these |
42 |
can be completed, so putting them on the feature list usually ends up |
43 |
being an exercise in futility. If some people are willing to help out |
44 |
carpaski and genone, then I will add it to the list, but if they are |
45 |
left implementing and testing these two rather substantial features |
46 |
themselves, I am not adding them to the list. |
47 |
|
48 |
Ok, that should cover it, thanks for the input and please keep at it :) |
49 |
|
50 |
Cheers, |
51 |
//zhen |
52 |
-- |
53 |
John Davis |
54 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
55 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
56 |
|
57 |
---- |
58 |
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc> |
59 |
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47 |