Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: John Davis <zhen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 19:01:16
Message-Id: 1083351681.8842.145.camel@woot.uberdavis.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests by John Davis
1 On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 23:42, John Davis wrote:
2 > Hi all -
3 > To start preparing for 2004.2 in July, releng is opening up Feature
4 > Requests that the community would like to see included in 2004.2. The
5 > last day that we are accepting requests is Friday, May 7th at which
6 > point releng will hold a meeting and decide which requests are feasible
7 > for both the alloted time and workload. Thank you for your time and your
8 > requests.
9 >
10 > Cheers,
11 > //zhen
12
13 Ok, sorry for the lag in response, I had 2 exams today plus I am
14 fighting a cold. I will try to answer all of the questions :) If I
15 forget any, please send jforman my way with a baseball bat, he loves
16 that type of thing.
17
18 First, if your request is a package inclusion request (such as distcc,
19 netcat) please bug it on bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to
20 release@g.o. These requests are rather trivial to implement, so a
21 full blown feature request is not needed. Necessary dicussion can be
22 carried out on bugs.gentoo.org.
23
24 Next, the release schedule. There are a couple of ways to go about this.
25 I think Daniel built an end of the year/ holiday break into the release
26 schedule when he first came up with the quarterly schedule. The break
27 from (late) October -> January/ February is meant to accomodate this.
28 Personally, I think it is a good idea as it gives us all time to
29 re-group, spend time with family, and perhaps hack in our spare time on
30 the harder features, etc. Of course, if people want to change this, we
31 can change the release cycle so that the big break is over the summer
32 and the regular 2 month cycle at the end of the year. Alternatively, we
33 could redo the schedule so that those extra months at the end of the
34 year are reabsorbed into the schedule to space out all of the releases
35 equally. I am very open to ideas, so please provide your input.
36
37 Portage enhancements are a tough one. I know that genone has emerge
38 security almost there and GPG manifest signing is somewhere in the
39 middle (need verification here). The problem in making these release
40 guidelines is the fact that they are totally dependent on 2 people's
41 time and work. Releng does not have control over whether or not these
42 can be completed, so putting them on the feature list usually ends up
43 being an exercise in futility. If some people are willing to help out
44 carpaski and genone, then I will add it to the list, but if they are
45 left implementing and testing these two rather substantial features
46 themselves, I am not adding them to the list.
47
48 Ok, that should cover it, thanks for the input and please keep at it :)
49
50 Cheers,
51 //zhen
52 --
53 John Davis
54 Gentoo Linux Developer
55 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
56
57 ----
58 GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
59 Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies