1 |
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:55:30 -0500 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:04:10PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Looking to the list of packages still not supporting python 3.5: |
8 |
> > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gpyutils/34-to-35.txt |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > and considering that we should even start testing python 3.6, I |
11 |
> > think it would be nice if we could make portage to warn when |
12 |
> > PYTHON_COMPAT value is not updated. It's really frustrating to |
13 |
> > still see new ebuilds being added with obsolete values for |
14 |
> > PYTHON_COMPAT and relying on a few people looking to update this. |
15 |
> > This is also causing huge delays to migrate to newer python |
16 |
> > versions and I think it's responsibility of the maintainer to |
17 |
> > ensure his/her package is supported on newer versions or, at least, |
18 |
> > have a bug and ping upstream for the cases they need further fixing. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Of course, this wouldn't be a fatal check preventing you from |
21 |
> > committing a package with outdated PYTHON_COMPAT, it would be a |
22 |
> > warning to remind you to update it as soon as possible. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Any issues on trying to go further into implementing this |
25 |
> > warning? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> What about the situation where a package is not compatible with newer |
28 |
> versions of python so does not need a PYTHON_COMPAT change? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I don't think you can assume PYTHON_COMPAT is outdated for a package |
31 |
> just because it doesn't have the latest versions of python |
32 |
> listed. The only time you can know for sure that it is outdated is if |
33 |
> it lists a version of python that no longer exists in the tree. |
34 |
|
35 |
Maybe we should add some - modifier to PYTHON_COMPAT, just like |
36 |
keywords, indicating it has been tested to *not* work. |
37 |
PYTHON_COMPAT=( python{2_7,3_4,3_5} -python_3_6 ) |