Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 21:13:04
Message-Id: 20030906231302.7de3699f.genone@genone.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions by Douglas Russell
1 On 09/06/03 Douglas Russell wrote:
2
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA1
5 >
6 > On Saturday 06 September 2003 9:46 pm, Thomas de Grenier de Latour
7 > wrote:
8 > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:50:42 +0200
9 > >
10 > > Marius Mauch <genone@××××××.de> wrote:
11 > > > A accurate progress bar is nearly impossible as compile times
12 > > > differ from package to package
13 > >
14 > > Maybe maintainers could fill in the ebuilds a kind of approximative
15 > > compile time from their experience, which would be relative to a
16 > > well know reference time (a kernel compilation with default options,
17 > > or something like this). It doesn't need to be very accurate.
18 >
19 > This has also been discussed recently, I'm not sure if there was a
20 > resolution. I think it came down to what was happening about gentoo
21 > stats...as of course, an approx value on a Athlon XP 2800+ with a gig
22 > of RAM is not going to help someone on a P133 with 32 MBs of RAM.
23 > Stats would allow a lookup against previous emerges done on similar
24 > spec'd machines.
25
26 And don't forget the impact of USE flags.
27
28 --
29 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
30
31 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
32 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list