1 |
On 09/06/03 Douglas Russell wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Saturday 06 September 2003 9:46 pm, Thomas de Grenier de Latour |
7 |
> wrote: |
8 |
> > On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:50:42 +0200 |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Marius Mauch <genone@××××××.de> wrote: |
11 |
> > > A accurate progress bar is nearly impossible as compile times |
12 |
> > > differ from package to package |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Maybe maintainers could fill in the ebuilds a kind of approximative |
15 |
> > compile time from their experience, which would be relative to a |
16 |
> > well know reference time (a kernel compilation with default options, |
17 |
> > or something like this). It doesn't need to be very accurate. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> This has also been discussed recently, I'm not sure if there was a |
20 |
> resolution. I think it came down to what was happening about gentoo |
21 |
> stats...as of course, an approx value on a Athlon XP 2800+ with a gig |
22 |
> of RAM is not going to help someone on a P133 with 32 MBs of RAM. |
23 |
> Stats would allow a lookup against previous emerges done on similar |
24 |
> spec'd machines. |
25 |
|
26 |
And don't forget the impact of USE flags. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
30 |
|
31 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
32 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |