| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 06 September 2003 9:46 pm, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:50:42 +0200 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Marius Mauch <genone@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > A accurate progress bar is nearly impossible as compile times differ |
| 9 |
> > from package to package |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Maybe maintainers could fill in the ebuilds a kind of approximative |
| 12 |
> compile time from their experience, which would be relative to a |
| 13 |
> well know reference time (a kernel compilation with default options, or |
| 14 |
> something like this). It doesn't need to be very accurate. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This has also been discussed recently, I'm not sure if there was a resolution. |
| 17 |
I think it came down to what was happening about gentoo stats...as of course, |
| 18 |
an approx value on a Athlon XP 2800+ with a gig of RAM is not going to help |
| 19 |
someone on a P133 with 32 MBs of RAM. Stats would allow a lookup against |
| 20 |
previous emerges done on similar spec'd machines. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Puggy |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQE/WknzXYnvgFdTojMRAsHGAKDOcLOYbrkeFw8D7sQ69EeW/GLUkwCcC4Zx |
| 27 |
nE1woeHGDeT1Y0LAdxbIvTM= |
| 28 |
=hCJf |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives