Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions | ||
| Date: | Sat, 06 Sep 2003 20:40:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030906224656.78bc2898.degrenier@easyconnect.fr | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:50:42 +0200 |
| 2 | Marius Mauch <genone@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > A accurate progress bar is nearly impossible as compile times differ |
| 6 | > from package to package |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Maybe maintainers could fill in the ebuilds a kind of approximative |
| 9 | compile time from their experience, which would be relative to a |
| 10 | well know reference time (a kernel compilation with default options, or |
| 11 | something like this). It doesn't need to be very accurate. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | TGL. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions | Douglas Russell <puggy@×××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions | Brian Harring <bdharring@××××.edu> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions | Rutger Lubbers <ripat@××××××.nl> |