| 1 |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:19:13 +0200 |
| 2 |
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 06/06/2016 04:53 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > This -can- be simplified using a REQUIRED_USE to force just-one-of |
| 7 |
> > gtk3,qt4,qt5 , but you can technically do the same with USE=gui too |
| 8 |
> > -- all you'd need to do is add dependencies for the |
| 9 |
> > no-specific-flag case. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > RDEPEND="... |
| 12 |
> > qt5? ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) |
| 13 |
> > qt4? ( dev-qt/qtcore:4 ) |
| 14 |
> > gtk3? ( x11-libs/gtk+:3 ) |
| 15 |
> > gui? ( !qt5? ( !qt4? ( !gtk3? ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) ) )" |
| 16 |
> Wow, that is wonderfully horrible, and making me a little bit |
| 17 |
> angry ... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So USE="-qt5 gui" enables qt5 in this scenario. How is that |
| 20 |
> reasonable? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't think that's unreasonable given that it only does that when qt4 |
| 23 |
and gtk3 are disabled. Some packages require qt5 unconditionally, is |
| 24 |
that bad too? I'm not saying I like this, I'm indifferent at best, but |
| 25 |
it does makes some sense. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives