| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 07/06/16 11:27, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 5 |
> I don't think that's unreasonable given that it only does that |
| 6 |
> when qt4 and gtk3 are disabled. |
| 7 |
It is horribly counter-intuitive. -qt5 should never result in qt5. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Some packages require qt5 unconditionally, is that bad too? |
| 10 |
It is if the requirement isn't made explicit. |
| 11 |
- -- |
| 12 |
Alexander |
| 13 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 14 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 15 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVq7EAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BwNkP/0asGItiUp06RUSdtJap/dLl |
| 19 |
gMywlasHuS3vB8AxL4M1aXx+F8JRJj7O+SSzc0MZdbGJ+CpNUvAOKQj+I7VmnBGe |
| 20 |
k0AV/SFxvugmWdsYeMuOi7l+St6QaQxbjVrH7Sdlh+g9OtQNRKIIsXZ6/jvOSUlv |
| 21 |
WQPhbiSzWBNCQYXaHkV2ooY4eCIf3aRZK047EqiXo4jcLWjrfrtYUGEfgmWJ7DIt |
| 22 |
zMXHo3I2S7/B6LIOdKSO0h7H4KkOr6tYHi+RdwsNFStNuSEQ+gNbC9Dq1iclvaiP |
| 23 |
ljDNE7yDtr+cUEt6XjoGkZcGEuycK1qWnUyB6CJUmWiJCE5vy8QfAn1v4eFp0wII |
| 24 |
HcUEf/qHFUxFCfe4QY9S0IQ6aBW0ut57gqB0jWanegm+oyqdfq7V2/N5I/Jz1WR9 |
| 25 |
okxhgmlEorCoBMOMbNUmHL1Lg1g4TC4I3J4j8KBctUIm5z1eVex3fGWglDttPmx8 |
| 26 |
Be9K4sv8oHnd01PNmovFBIblOk/q96zdKCgY5zA5mqw7e2LI6flhfgwFikard2Pn |
| 27 |
yKBokrgY6a4gqvx0BhCGa2Y7r9ZEqsNGqP+XIFrv9qOD6mUMQj3vL0lEFtg3W0lf |
| 28 |
8RLctUGaAGc1eLl7QdjeC3J7hBW2zFKUntxP/8fXrK8jAVmtefRbWjXNqTzzN8Y0 |
| 29 |
2e4tUmOzXZfSmUmmulro |
| 30 |
=/aAN |
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives