| 1 |
> > Something that annoys me is the license : there is [3], [4] and [5], |
| 2 |
> > so GPL-2 might probably be fine, but I'm definitely not a lawyer... |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> You can add several licenses to LICENSE. And a lot of packages are |
| 5 |
> LPPL, so you really need to adjust it. There has been a discussion on |
| 6 |
> the TeXLive about the licenses [1]. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
thanks for the link, switched to LPPL1.3c & GPL-2 as base licenses plus |
| 9 |
some extra ones based on fedora's reviews on a per package basis. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > Now a question to arch teams : Should I keyword this for systems |
| 12 |
> > I've tested it or just add without keywords and let you do another |
| 13 |
> > layer of checks ? I've been using it on ~x86 (and hardenend but |
| 14 |
> > mpost had problems), ~amd64 and ~ppc64 (this one has some missing |
| 15 |
> > deps, but don't worry I'll poke you as soon as I'll have done extra |
| 16 |
> > checks ;) ). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I am all for new keywording as it is a major step forward from teTeX. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
will do like that |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Alexis. |
Archives