Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Tsoy <alexander@××××.me> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:06:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1386796033.17750.3.camel@Nokia-N900 | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | On Wed Dec 11 23:30:58 2013 Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 | > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 | > > Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie |
| 4 | > > forked it fixing some bugs :/ |
| 5 | > > |
| 6 | > > What do you think? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > I think that nobody who is not intimately familiar with the |
| 9 | > development in both projects can think anything that is actionable. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | vixie-cron upstream is dead and this is a well-known fact. Example of "development" in vixie-cron project: |
| 12 | |
| 13 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308055 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Alexander Tsoy |