1 |
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 14:22:56 |
2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the |
10 |
> > tree. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> [...] |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several |
15 |
> > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions |
16 |
> > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting |
17 |
> > the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I think we should be consistent with how we handle this, and personally |
20 |
> > I would vote for the first way since zsh is not all that common. |
21 |
> > However, if the feeling is that we should nuke the zsh-completion use |
22 |
> > flag, I'll be the first to do it, and I'll start opening bugs against |
23 |
> > other packages. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Please let's nuke the useflag and install the files unconditionally. This is |
26 |
> the overall agreed policy for small add-on files. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> (The only real alternative would be to finally, please, please, please |
29 |
> introduce IUSE_RUNTIME. Which just got booted from EAPI=6 again.) |
30 |
|
31 |
IUSE_RUNTIME wouldn't allow you to change installed files. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |