Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:20:28
Message-Id: 201503291422.59801.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? by William Hubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs:
5
6 > I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the
7 > tree.
8 >
9 [...]
10
11 > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
12 > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
13 > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting
14 > the rdepend on app-shells/zsh.
15 >
16 > I think we should be consistent with how we handle this, and personally
17 > I would vote for the first way since zsh is not all that common.
18 > However, if the feeling is that we should nuke the zsh-completion use
19 > flag, I'll be the first to do it, and I'll start opening bugs against
20 > other packages.
21
22 Please let's nuke the useflag and install the files unconditionally. This is
23 the overall agreed policy for small add-on files.
24
25 (The only real alternative would be to finally, please, please, please
26 introduce IUSE_RUNTIME. Which just got booted from EAPI=6 again.)
27
28 - --
29 Andreas K. Huettel
30 Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
31 dilfridge@g.o
32 http://www.akhuettel.de/
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v2
35
36 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVF+6gAAoJEB9VdM6hupKV0LAP/0NZxMJ0Gt+Fz89la1LTkfpq
37 88HehQQ7u69liFX+/EI+dWMS8ZCzg9H1VefhIWwDIC42LAVE+gPbheVBSgfcqFr2
38 8KLsPrl4Vp++XyidScE5CD71Oy/XXK6wsy8VoPQtppGAKEh56+cqIdSwUpU4W4yj
39 o1blqw+/pnwuuxnwdVGuhrht24xVhMdZOTDGVpUqscxIiEvn9lDFQydy7OYZlk3n
40 wQsQQ5SiCWZXHJjhSxbvRBSIzXVt4enp/f/mUpf+p3f16M2tS/ALeCpR/TB1o62d
41 FPWCDPaMzxMaAIoxObQ021cRWOcZ09kBxJstI/7J1Vnw0W0zFyLlevJ6wmwoimGl
42 Vav1zGZMk0cl/ft8c6nlRi876eDwpwGAhsF51MM4ijtB4mBkBveR+gLUjHDdOYWq
43 jOqOysDF1Fv0JeVwJEpk71HotcN/ev1GE3DlveaGssT9lPb1sQrCRydkIxwKKuoQ
44 v/AjeBkTSliQ0vtYID4hUdSlVTpkcdURqtckuXJiVxqxhOMh87XKuzR67R16hUU2
45 mgizmqYnlnSm9+cG4XKDE3y3q4w1QIynjZyjQJDWySaF7yV6SRSuyEaTK///1ufH
46 k1E0NX9IG+9uIzxUgxhh3GqCy8h5pqFvXXHtGYJU5ipUVJCfVHQAGcWNY+qga6dB
47 3j1XVICXWyptqyXhfJFu
48 =YceU
49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>