1 |
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 07:20 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > I don't know about general consensus. In my opinion, it's plain spam to |
4 |
> > existing users. (And that would IMO be the xth news item in a row to be |
5 |
> > spam.) |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Can't say I agree here. Some news items have been more useful than |
8 |
> others, but I doubt the typical Gentoo user (who does not subscribe to |
9 |
> -dev) would think that many of the past messages have been spam. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Right now news is our only mechanism to warn users that something is |
12 |
> about to happen BEFORE it happens. Anytime I talk to somebody who has |
13 |
> left Gentoo the #1 thing I tend to hear is that they were tired of |
14 |
> things just breaking without warning. Even following -dev I've been |
15 |
> surprised by the odd upgrade - I can imagine the typical user would be |
16 |
> even more confused. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Long-time Gentoo users aren't going to notice in the handbook that the |
19 |
> location of /etc/make.conf has moved - I know that if I'm doing an |
20 |
> install I tend to use the handbook as a checklist but I skim through |
21 |
> it so fast that I doubt I'd notice a big change. They're going to |
22 |
> appreciate a heads-up. The only people who wouldn't consider it news |
23 |
> are those following this list, and judging by the state of this thread |
24 |
> you'll already have read 40 posts on the topic, so the 41st won't be |
25 |
> that big of a deal. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Rich |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Apologies for butting in as a user: |
31 |
|
32 |
As a user of Gentoo from about 2002 or so, with multiple gentoo systems, |
33 |
this thread is the first I have heard of make.conf moving ... cant |
34 |
imagine I am the only one! and are you about to break our systems |
35 |
unannounced (again) ? - its not spam to give us a heads up, even if its |
36 |
just reassurance. |
37 |
|
38 |
Sorry, but I would rather know. |
39 |
BillK |