| 1 |
Lares Moreau wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:13 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>is the 25-55 minute lag good enough? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> It may need to be good enough. Personally I would like to have < 5-7 |
| 7 |
> min. That way when I'm working with a dev, I can keep up to speed with |
| 8 |
> her/him without having to resort to an overlay and emailing |
| 9 |
> ebuilds.tar's. A dedicated 'AT/HT' sync box sounds like an acceptable |
| 10 |
> solution. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
For now, I don't want to rsync more than every 30 minutes (concerns of |
| 13 |
overloading the main cvs server). Pylon has mentioned that the newer |
| 14 |
version of cvs has better commit hooks that may allow for more of a live |
| 15 |
replication effect, but I don't expect that to happen any time soon. I |
| 16 |
will try and come up with a revised version of GLEP 41 and see if |
| 17 |
hparker and folks will agree with this new solution. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We will probably still have the blocking script on this server, but will |
| 20 |
be at a much higher level. This is just to prevent folks from abusing |
| 21 |
the service or giving out their access for other people to use. I really |
| 22 |
don't see that happening, but I would prefer to have some kind of |
| 23 |
prevention in place for infra's sake. I'll have to think out details on |
| 24 |
the authentication scheme for access, but I would assume it would be per |
| 25 |
AT and not a shared access account. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Thoughts? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 31 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
--- |
| 34 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 35 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives