Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:22:49
Message-Id: 43FAE977.3060009@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting all log related packages into it's own category (sys-logging) by Stuart Herbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Stuart Herbert skrev:
5 > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 20:30 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
6 >> Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
7 >> resolved, moving packages around should be avoided.
8 >
9 > It's a shame we can't find a way to turn package categories into solely
10 > a presentational feature, rather than being an integral part of the
11 > package's identity as it is today. (And, at the same time, multi-depth
12 > categories would also be nice :)
13 >
14 > With the way things are today, "improvements" to the structure of the
15 > package tree are held back by our historical legacy. As the tree grows,
16 > it makes sense to move packages into new groups that weren't viable
17 > before - and to clear out historical dumping grounds in the process.
18 >
19 > If package categories were only something that users used to find things
20 > - and weren't used by Portage as part of a package's unique identity -
21 > then we could afford to be more flexible on this.
22 >
23 > Best regards,
24 > Stu
25
26 That sounds like a cool idea, but it requires a few things.
27 We need a way to browse the tree, that supports packages being in
28 several categories. (Lets call them category-keywords).
29
30 Having a directory structure might not be the best way, since the
31 category-keywords will be more of a metadata thing, than a directory.
32
33 I'm not sure how this could be implemented, but it sure requires a GLEP.
34
35 Any suggestions on how this could be implemented? (Maybe having a SQLite
36 database with all the meta info, to save some time syncing and space.
37 Could with a bit of luck have all the metadata for portage, like digests
38 etc. , but thats another idea though).
39
40 Best Regards
41 Bjarke
42 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
44 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
45
46 iD8DBQFD+ul3O+Ewtpi9rLERAixWAKC8uMwIAcnAmxcvjkgXiia/Z3KK0ACg2Zdg
47 GWZEqPUXAypXf43OMn2vzcs=
48 =SXAM
49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
50 --
51 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies