Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nicholas Jones <>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 04:05:27
Message-Id: 20041013040519.GA15051@twobit.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size by Jason Rhinelander
1 > PLEASE be more scientific
2
3 I agree. Also... stop including more than you comment on!
4 Way too many people do this and it bothers me and all that
5 is wave and/or particle based.
6
7 > First, everything in portage:
8 >
9 > find . \( -not -path './distfiles/*' \) | perl -lne '$s+=-s; $c++;
10 > END{print "$c files, $s bytes total"}'
11 > 100120 files, 403235992 bytes total
12
13 Now... about this scientific thing... We appear to have a problem
14 in your method and/or collection process here... Or you have some
15 impressively large clustering on your box.
16
17 Here are some easily obtainable numbers... Rsync provides them.
18
19 Number of files: 100450
20 Total file size: 77658481 bytes
21 File list size: 2274372
22
23
24 Given this info and a fairly sane FS... like Reiser3 with tail
25 packing... You consume around 80 megs of disk space... About
26 one-fifth of what you mention... Even with 330 files less!
27
28 Spork.
29
30 --NJ

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size George Shapovalov <george@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Jason Rhinelander <jason@××××××××××××××××.com>