From: | Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? | ||
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:05:26 | ||
Message-Id: | 1137596414.13484.21.camel@sys947.dtic.mil | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? by Drake Wyrm |
1 | On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 06:27 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote: |
2 | > Personally, no, but others do. I should have been less ambiguous (and |
3 | > obnoxious) in my initial response. Please don't assume that just because |
4 | > _you_ don't need a static Perl, that _nobody_ needs a static Perl. |
5 | |
6 | Actually, the whole point to my even starting the email thread was to |
7 | see if anyone was using the static library or not - i'm not aware of |
8 | anything that builds only against the static, but i'm blissful on a lot |
9 | of subject matters. |
10 | |
11 | ~mcummings |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? | Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> |