Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still?
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:33:17
Message-Id: 20060118142750.GA18071@phaenix.haell.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? by Michael Cummings
1 Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 20:18 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
3 >
4 > > Portage is not the only important system tool. Some of us actually
5 > > use Perl. Please do not be with the breaking.
6 >
7 > Is this to say there is a valid need for both libperl.a and libperl.so
8 > on your box?
9
10 Personally, no, but others do. I should have been less ambiguous (and
11 obnoxious) in my initial response. Please don't assume that just because
12 _you_ don't need a static Perl, that _nobody_ needs a static Perl.
13
14 --
15 my other signature is witty
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies