Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping implementation in portage
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:25:53
Message-Id: 430A5E74.3010205@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping implementation in portage by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jason Stubbs wrote:
5 | On Tuesday 23 August 2005 07:38, Brian Harring wrote:
6 |>So... thoughts? I'd be particularly curious about any package where
7 |>this wouldn't be viable.
8 |
9 |
10 | I believe xorg-x11 is one such package. But then, this might just be a
11 | reason for a pkg_strip().
12
13 xorg respects FEATURES=nostrip, although it has a custom implementation.
14
15 In the modular X, stripping the modules seems to work fine, so we can
16 get rid of that custom strip.
17
18 Donnie
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iD8DBQFDCl5zXVaO67S1rtsRAsAEAKCenAMncB0Hxah0NuQQSP9jujg4nwCeM/C0
23 zQS/ubpM2M3leUDQ/C/8fWw=
24 =pfEZ
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list