From: | Chris Mayo <aklhfex@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed | ||
Date: | Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:39:37 | ||
Message-Id: | fa18a282-4ab3-081c-139f-ce995cf2f51d@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | On 03/09/17 22:22, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 | > On 09/03/2017 11:56 AM, Chris Mayo wrote: |
3 | >> # |
4 | >> # The following snippet would suggest app-misc/foo for optional foo support, |
5 | >> # app-misc/bar or app-misc/baz[bar] for optional bar support |
6 | >> |
7 | > |
8 | > Would the @EXAMPLE tag[0] make sense here? |
9 | > |
10 | > |
11 | > [0] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
12 | > |
13 | |
14 | I believe @EXAMPLE is only for the first documentation block introducing the eclass. |
15 | |
16 | At least where it is used for functions the text doesn't show up in the man page. |
17 | e.g. prefix.eclass hprefixify() and prefixify_ro() |
18 | |
19 | https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-reference/prefix.eclass/index.html |
20 | |
21 | https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/eclass/prefix.eclass?id=61b861acd7b49083dab687e133f30f3331cb7480 |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |