From: | "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc | ||
Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:53:42 | ||
Message-Id: | m3brvmmavm.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc by Peter Ruskin |
1 | >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com> writes: |
2 | |
3 | Peter> # cat /etc/portage/package.mask | grep glibc # glibc-2.3.2 |
4 | |
5 | In my experience, /etc/portage/package.mask is ignored, unlike |
6 | /etc/portage/package.unmask. |
7 | |
8 | The OP is probably having the same problem. |
9 | |
10 | (I had just guessed, when .unmask was added, that .mask |
11 | would also work. But my experimentation proved otherwise.) |
12 | |
13 | So why does it *work* for you? :) |
14 | |
15 | -JimC |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | -- |
19 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc | Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> |