Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:00:14
Message-Id: 200307230000.07990.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc by "James H. Cloos Jr."
1 On Tuesday 22 Jul 2003 23:53, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
2 > >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 > Peter> # cat /etc/portage/package.mask | grep glibc # glibc-2.3.2
5 >
6 > In my experience, /etc/portage/package.mask is ignored, unlike
7 > /etc/portage/package.unmask.
8 >
9 > The OP is probably having the same problem.
10 >
11 > (I had just guessed, when .unmask was added, that .mask
12 > would also work. But my experimentation proved otherwise.)
13 >
14 > So why does it *work* for you? :)
15 >
16 > -JimC
17
18 It does work. When it was first introduced it was
19 /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask for some reason. Now it's
20 /etc/portage/package.mask.
21
22 Perhaps yours is still in the old location? Otherwise I can't see why
23 it works for me and not for you. I don't think there's anything
24 special about my box.
25
26 Peter
27 --
28 ==================================================
29 Gentoo Linux: Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.7
30 kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
31 ==================================================
32
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@×××××××.com>