| 1 |
060506 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 06 May 2006 08:48, Philip Webb wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I've seen this stated before, but why does it have to be "_at once_" ? |
| 4 |
> Because 3.4 and 3.5 does _NOT_ mix together! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
That's not an explanation: it merely restates your assertion. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> Many packages have > 1 stable version available, |
| 9 |
>> so users might have KDE 3.4.3 (all) & 3.5.1 (parts) by now, |
| 10 |
>> with the rest of 3.5.1 & then some of 3.5.2 to follow soon. |
| 11 |
> KDE 3.5.1 is no more in portage, |
| 12 |
> a part those packages which haven't changed with 3.5.2 |
| 13 |
> and akregator that seems to have problems with 3.5.2 version at least here. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sorry, your sentence doesn't make sense as English. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> Any stable version of KDE will need kdelibs kdebase , |
| 18 |
>> but otherwise why can't the packages be made stable |
| 19 |
>> at least as each big downloadable file becomes ready, if not individually ? |
| 20 |
> Because they have to be stable at once. Period. |
| 21 |
> Can't go stable piece by piece. Period. |
| 22 |
> Can't. Period. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Again, you're simply repeating yourself without any attempt to explain. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Can anyone else offer an explanation for the claim |
| 27 |
that all KDE packages (for one version) have to be stabilised together ? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
========================,,============================================ |
| 31 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@××××××××××××××.ca |
| 32 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies |
| 33 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives