Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 11:46:51
Message-Id: 200605061341.56971@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? by Philip Webb
1 On Saturday 06 May 2006 08:48, Philip Webb wrote:
2 > I've seen this stated before, but why does it have to be "_at once_" ?
3 Because 3.4 and 3.5 does _NOT_ mix together!
4
5 > Many packages have > 1 stable version available,
6 > so users might have KDE 3.4.3 (all) & 3.5.1 (parts) by now,
7 > with the rest of 3.5.1 & then some of 3.5.2 to follow soon.
8 KDE 3.5.1 is no more in portage, a part those packages which haven't changed
9 with 3.5.2 and akregator that seems to have problems with 3.5.2 version, at
10 least here.
11
12 > Any stable version of KDE will need kdelibs kdebase ,
13 > but otherwise why can't the packages be made stable
14 > at least as each big downloadable file becomes ready, if not individually ?
15 Because they have to be stable at once. Period.
16
17 Can't go stable piece by piece. Period.
18 Can't. Period.
19
20 --
21 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
22 Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? Philip Webb <purslow@×××××××××.ca>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>