Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:43:51
Message-Id: 4384C5A7.2000306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass by Chris Gianelloni
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
5 | These packages do not need shadow (though the system might, but that's
6 | outside my scope) once they are installed, only to install. However, it
7 | is not needed to build. What *DEPEND is correct?
8
9 It fits into RDEPEND (oddly enough), since binpkgs will need it as well
10 and they don't get DEPEND stuff.
11
12 Thanks,
13 Donnie
14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
16
17 iD8DBQFDhMWnXVaO67S1rtsRAv4RAJ45Wsjoz4wBzpjI+Tw3S7LAdw7NXACguR4H
18 9kHmi0rLZHbd69kQZlZNTW4=
19 =GfzO
20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] enewuser/enewgroup getting their own eclass Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>