1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Saturday 10 July 2004 11:21 am, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
5 |
> On Saturday 10 July 2004 15:41, Jeff Smelser wrote: |
6 |
> > Which is getting me right were I thought I would be in this, the devs |
7 |
> > just basically do what they want. They follow the rules when they want |
8 |
> > to. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I can't find an official policy that says that a package must be moved from |
11 |
> ~arch after the thirty day period is complete. To be honest, I can't find |
12 |
> an official policy that says a package has to stay in ~arch for thirty days |
13 |
> either. |
14 |
|
15 |
Its there, someone sent it. Its just a standard. its not a concreate date. It |
16 |
will be released soon, is all I know. |
17 |
|
18 |
> > I don't know anymore.. Let the devs just do what they want.. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> We all do what we can manage in the time we have available. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If your expectations can't be met by Gentoo, there are plenty of commercial |
23 |
> distributions out there who *do* have paid staff. No-one's forcing you to |
24 |
> use Gentoo at all ;-) |
25 |
|
26 |
Thats not what I said, nor implied.. I asked to help you guys get the release |
27 |
out, not you get this release out right now or else. |
28 |
|
29 |
> > Funny thing is, if I had just got the reply from him, and none of this |
30 |
> > other crap, this wouldn't be the thread that it is... |
31 |
> |
32 |
> You call it 'crap' ... we call it an education. We're trying to help you. |
33 |
> If this isn't the sort of help you find useful, then Gentoo Linux is |
34 |
> probably the wrong choice for you. |
35 |
|
36 |
Some was educational, some others was just poking at me.. |
37 |
|
38 |
> If you're going to use Gentoo, it's important that you have the right |
39 |
> expectations about Gentoo Linux and the *very* hard working volunteers |
40 |
> (devs and users alike) who give up their free time to contribute. |
41 |
|
42 |
I should, I have been here since the beginning.. Things have changed however. |
43 |
|
44 |
> Yes, lots of things could be better. Lord knows I'm quick to be vocal |
45 |
> about that myself. But to make things better takes manpower (and |
46 |
> womanpower ;-) and people willing to roll their sleeves up and get |
47 |
> involved. |
48 |
|
49 |
I said I was.. That was my point through all this. I say now, as I said |
50 |
before, kde 3.2.3 should be released. If Celeb told me right now, X bug is |
51 |
stopping it, I am on it.. Celeb, from what I interpreted, said 3.2.3 is |
52 |
ready, he has just been spending his time on 3.3 and been to busy. So my |
53 |
question is, how would I get 3.2.3 done for him? Can I? I will spend my time |
54 |
running repoman, I don't care.. |
55 |
|
56 |
Jeff |
57 |
- -- |
58 |
======================================================================= |
59 |
Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) |
60 |
Quote: Quelqu'un qui dit des choses intéressantes, on l'ecoute, même quand il |
61 |
ne dit rien. -- Philippe Geluck, Le Chat |
62 |
======================================================================= |
63 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
64 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
65 |
|
66 |
iD8DBQFA8CDmld4MRA3gEwYRArvrAJ9EEY7AYc9XWFlihHCKrv83xFK1EgCdHMju |
67 |
5ntEtkitTJsq+be67Rmv1tk= |
68 |
=VIo1 |
69 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
70 |
|
71 |
-- |
72 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |