| 1 |
Very good job. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
2007/4/13, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> here is a summary of this month's meeting. people seem to think that the CoC |
| 5 |
> is set in stone now when in reality it is not ... feel free to hilite |
| 6 |
> anything you feel wasnt addressed in the previous discussion or anything new |
| 7 |
> you've thought of (i went through the previous threads and tried to distill |
| 8 |
> out things that were missed, but i cant catch it all). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> CoC: |
| 11 |
> - amne has been doing a good job putting the group together |
| 12 |
> - ask proctors to address these two issues for next meeting: |
| 13 |
> - add a "mission" statement |
| 14 |
> - fix wording to have a positive spin |
| 15 |
> sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities): |
| 16 |
> - trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then |
| 17 |
> we'll look again at syncing |
| 18 |
> documentation for mail servers: |
| 19 |
> - they are supposed to be finished in terms of content |
| 20 |
> - wolf will look at getting them actually committed |
| 21 |
> PMS: |
| 22 |
> - current status looks good in getting issues resolved |
| 23 |
> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting |
| 24 |
> - let the devs sort out the todo as the current work flow seems |
| 25 |
> to be getting things done finally |
| 26 |
> splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists: |
| 27 |
> - no real favorable backing for this |
| 28 |
> - people dont like -dev because of the crap, splitting the lists |
| 29 |
> will just move the crap else where, not really solving anything |
| 30 |
> - let proctors do their thing and if need be, review this again |
| 31 |
> limiting of council powers: |
| 32 |
> - doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or |
| 33 |
> the council itself |
| 34 |
> - if a majority of developers are truly upset/disturbed by a |
| 35 |
> council decision, it should show easily |
| 36 |
> - if you dont like a council member, dont vote for them next time |
| 37 |
> moving gentoo-core to public archives: |
| 38 |
> - many people dislike this moving forward |
| 39 |
> - use -dev over -core for most things |
| 40 |
> - not going to happen at this time |
| 41 |
> - look into getting a dev-only archive finally |
| 42 |
> surveys: |
| 43 |
> - robbat2 will look at getting user/dev surveys in place after the |
| 44 |
> release of 2007.0 |
| 45 |
> - probably try and take fresh surveys after each bi-annual release |
| 46 |
> from now on to see if we're meeting many of users' desires |
| 47 |
> new metastructure proposal: |
| 48 |
> - doesnt seem to address any of the problems it proposes to |
| 49 |
> - a large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree |
| 50 |
> development style that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> full log at the normal place: |
| 53 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070412.txt |
| 54 |
> -mike |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives