1 |
here is a summary of this month's meeting. people seem to think that the CoC |
2 |
is set in stone now when in reality it is not ... feel free to hilite |
3 |
anything you feel wasnt addressed in the previous discussion or anything new |
4 |
you've thought of (i went through the previous threads and tried to distill |
5 |
out things that were missed, but i cant catch it all). |
6 |
|
7 |
CoC: |
8 |
- amne has been doing a good job putting the group together |
9 |
- ask proctors to address these two issues for next meeting: |
10 |
- add a "mission" statement |
11 |
- fix wording to have a positive spin |
12 |
sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities): |
13 |
- trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then |
14 |
we'll look again at syncing |
15 |
documentation for mail servers: |
16 |
- they are supposed to be finished in terms of content |
17 |
- wolf will look at getting them actually committed |
18 |
PMS: |
19 |
- current status looks good in getting issues resolved |
20 |
- should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting |
21 |
- let the devs sort out the todo as the current work flow seems |
22 |
to be getting things done finally |
23 |
splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists: |
24 |
- no real favorable backing for this |
25 |
- people dont like -dev because of the crap, splitting the lists |
26 |
will just move the crap else where, not really solving anything |
27 |
- let proctors do their thing and if need be, review this again |
28 |
limiting of council powers: |
29 |
- doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or |
30 |
the council itself |
31 |
- if a majority of developers are truly upset/disturbed by a |
32 |
council decision, it should show easily |
33 |
- if you dont like a council member, dont vote for them next time |
34 |
moving gentoo-core to public archives: |
35 |
- many people dislike this moving forward |
36 |
- use -dev over -core for most things |
37 |
- not going to happen at this time |
38 |
- look into getting a dev-only archive finally |
39 |
surveys: |
40 |
- robbat2 will look at getting user/dev surveys in place after the |
41 |
release of 2007.0 |
42 |
- probably try and take fresh surveys after each bi-annual release |
43 |
from now on to see if we're meeting many of users' desires |
44 |
new metastructure proposal: |
45 |
- doesnt seem to address any of the problems it proposes to |
46 |
- a large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree |
47 |
development style that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees |
48 |
|
49 |
full log at the normal place: |
50 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070412.txt |
51 |
-mike |