| 1 |
On Tue, 01 May 2007 19:46:56 -0400 |
| 2 |
Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> There is one serious problem with this: Who's going to do the work to |
| 4 |
> figure all this out for the 11,000 odd packages in the tree? This |
| 5 |
> seems like a *huge* amount of work, work that I have no plan on doing |
| 6 |
> for the 100-odd packages I (help) maintain, let alone the 4-10 |
| 7 |
> different versions of each package. I highly doubt other maintainers |
| 8 |
> want to do this kind of work either. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that! |
| 11 |
No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't |
| 12 |
know how much work whatever it is is. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Having said that, there's no need to figure it out for the whole tree |
| 15 |
in one go if it's an EAPI change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives