Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Louis Sautier <sbraz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 22:27:15
Message-Id: 73805eeb-a099-91d6-0e13-b01ff94a2e78@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation by Alec Warner
1 On 06/08/2021 02:57, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@g.o> wrote:
3 >> Hi,
4 >>
5 >> We've been collecting more and more container related packages in
6 >> app-emulation/*
7 >>
8 >> What do you think about finally moving those packages to separate category?
9 > As always my opinion is that:
10 >
11 > (a) Categories were a design mistake.
12 > (b) The mistake is hard to fix.
13 > (c) It's basically low-value to try to 'correctly' categorize packages
14 > because of A.
15 > (d) Recategorizing means a bunch of stuff has to be updated.
16 >
17 > Do people actually care what category things are in? I just use
18 > --search or eix or whatever and the category is just this...bad
19 > concept we attach to packages for silly historical reasons..
20 >
21 > -A
22
23 Hi,
24
25 I also care about categories: if I want to find a Python MySQL library,
26 I'll run "eix -C dev-python mysql" (3 results) instead of a plain "eix
27 mysql" (33 results). And, as William said, they really help with
28 ambiguous package names such as docker.

Attachments

File name MIME type
OpenPGP_signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies