Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 23:50:54
Message-Id: CAHcsgXQ4uoMwdX1-0d-m+r32_4NpXnSqy_3SEMAPDHXw6Q1T_w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11 by hasufell
1 On 31 October 2014 22:38, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 > Signs of his inability to collaborate in some situations have come up
3 > repeatedly on this list, be it problems with crossdev/multilib, games
4 > team and whatnot.
5 >
6 > Most of these were either ignored or had to go through a council
7 > decision. That's not really efficient and cannot work long term.
8 >
9 > Do we treat some developers differently? And does all this social status
10 > crap really improve collaboration overall?
11
12 And we lost more than one developer in the process because of that.
13 And guess what? After someone reaching out to me off list telling me
14 to, essentially, work around him or swallow it, I'm more convinced
15 than ever that either someone else (Council? QA? the Pope?) fixes
16 this, or I'll add myself to that list.
17
18 Seriously, he essentially has been ignoring me altogether *when I was
19 voted the freaking QA lead*.
20
21 (To be fair, huge thanks to Rich and Jer for their help here, it does
22 feel good to know that at least some of the colleagues do have my
23 back.)
24
25 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
26 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Replies