| 1 |
Sorry for top posting. I volunteer to write something to get the logs attached to bugs. I'll do it next week. Whether it be something the tinderbox can run or something separate that will use pybugz to find bugs and then attach whatever logs are pointed to by URLs, etc, I'll figure it out. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> On 31 October 2014 22:38, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>> Signs of his inability to collaborate in some situations have come up |
| 9 |
>> repeatedly on this list, be it problems with crossdev/multilib, games |
| 10 |
>> team and whatnot. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Most of these were either ignored or had to go through a council |
| 13 |
>> decision. That's not really efficient and cannot work long term. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Do we treat some developers differently? And does all this social status |
| 16 |
>> crap really improve collaboration overall? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> And we lost more than one developer in the process because of that. |
| 19 |
> And guess what? After someone reaching out to me off list telling me |
| 20 |
> to, essentially, work around him or swallow it, I'm more convinced |
| 21 |
> than ever that either someone else (Council? QA? the Pope?) fixes |
| 22 |
> this, or I'll add myself to that list. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Seriously, he essentially has been ignoring me altogether *when I was |
| 25 |
> voted the freaking QA lead*. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> (To be fair, huge thanks to Rich and Jer for their help here, it does |
| 28 |
> feel good to know that at least some of the colleagues do have my |
| 29 |
> back.) |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 32 |
> flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 33 |
> |
Archives