Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: cilly <cilly@××××××××××.nu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:01:10
Message-Id: FF5BBB59-0CA1-4AC8-BFE8-7EA086E3A7E8@cilly.mine.nu
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: guidline to set a timeline of removal of ebuild from stable tree by Christian Faulhammer
1 On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
2
3 > That is not by purpose. Most people clean-up a package when
4 > stabilisation round has been done. So I must say clarify my first
5 > statement: I think it is a good idea to have old stable versions in
6 > the
7 > tree, but that should be the choice of the dev in the end without
8 > strict rules.
9
10 So what do we do with `the may be 5%` *) of packages this behaviour
11 is not working?
12
13 *) imaginary number
14 --
15 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list